Airport vs Community.
In the late nineties, the local managers and city planners proposed to lengthen one of the runways to accommodate the more modern corporate jets people are flying these days and also to strengthen the runway in the process in order to use the airport as an emergency landing spot for the jets at the international airport nearby. The local community got wind of this proposal and immediately went into an uproar. Petitions and complaints were filed by the truckload complaining about the noise that the airport already generated. They assumed that the lengthening of the runway would bring in commuter airlines and louder jets that would fly over their houses. The runway proposal was shot down.
On the surface, the communities arguments seemed reasonable. Most of their concerns, however, were unfounded. First of all, the airport was there long before there was much of a community to speak of. Complaining about aircraft noise that passes over the house you chose to build or buy near a runway is not a valid argument. The airport was already there and you invaded it's territory, not the other way around. Second, most modern corporate planes are bigger, faster and much quieter than their previous incarnations. A Lear-24, for example, is a much louder jet than a Lear-60 even though it's much smaller. Not much consideration was given to noise early in the jet age. Third, the chances of the airport becoming a commuter hub were slim at best. The International airport had just been expanded and there was no incentive for commuter airlines to set up shop at the smaller airport where people would not be able to make their connecting flights. Finally, lengthening a runway always provides a margin of safety. Too much runway is always better than not having enough. Just ask the parents of six year old Joshua Woods from Leroy, Indiana.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home